The Presidency has come out strongly to defend President Bola Tinubu’s role in the June 12 struggle, following recent comments by Alhaji Sule Lamido, former Governor of Jigawa State, that falsely accused Tinubu of supporting the annulment of the 1993 presidential election.
In a statement on Sunday by Mr. Bayo Onanuga, presidential spokesman, the presidency described Lamido’s allegations as patently false and an attempt at revisionism.
It said Tinubu’s actions during the June 12 crisis demonstrated his commitment to democracy and justice.
“On August 19, 1993, Sen. Tinubu condemned the annulment on the Senate floor, describing it as another coup d’état, urging Nigerians to reject injustice and lawlessness.
“We have a situation that suggests that the abortion of the June 12 election is another coup d’état,” Tinubu said.
“My question is, when are we going to stop tolerating injustices, coup d’état and abuse by the people on whom we invested so much resources—the public funds of this country?”
The Presidency also highlighted Tinubu’s role in the National Democratic Coalition (NADECO), which called on the military government of Sani Abacha to step down in favour of the winner of the June 12 election, MKO Abiola.
Tinubu lived in exile for nearly five years, during which time he continued to fund pro-June 12 protests in Lagos, including the blockade of the Third Mainland Bridge.
The Full State House Statement
SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT: PRESIDENT TINUBU’S ROLE IN THE JUNE 12 STRUGGLE
The attention of the Presidency has been drawn to recent comments made by Alhaji Sule Lamido, former Governor of Jigawa State, on live television, in which he falsely accused President Bola Tinubu of supporting the annulment of the June 12, 1993, presidential election. Alhaji Lamido’s claims represent a distortion of history and a regrettable attempt at revisionism. He alleged that President Tinubu only rose to prominence after the formation of NADECO and claimed that Tinubu’s mother, Alhaja Abibatu Mogaji, mobilised market women to back the annulment. These allegations are patently false.
Let us set the record straight:
1. Alhaja Mogaji never mobilised market women to support the unjust annulment. Had she done so, she would have lost her position as market leader in Lagos. While she once had a personal relationship with then-President Babangida, this was before the annulment crisis.
2. It is important to remind Nigerians that Alhaji Lamido, as secretary of the Social Democratic Party (SDP)—the party whose candidate, MKO Abiola, won the June 12 election—was among those who failed to oppose the military’s injustice. The SDP leadership, including Lamido and chairman Tony Anenih, wrote their names in the book of infamy by surrendering the people’s mandate without resistance. To their eternal shame, Lamido and Anenih teamed up with the defeated National Republican Convention to deny Abiola his mandate.
3. In sharp contrast, Senator Bola Tinubu stood firm even before General Abacha dissolved the political parties and all democratic institutions, including the National Assembly, on November 17, 1993, following his coup.
4. Days after General Babangida addressed the Senate and announced his decision to step aside on August 27, 1993, the setting up of an interim government to replace him, Senators debated the speech. On the Senate floor on August 19, 1993, Tinubu unequivocally condemned the annulment, describing it as another coup d’état and urging Nigerians to reject injustice and lawlessness. The records captured his contribution, showing that he supported upholding the June 12 election, not against it, as Lamido claimed.
“We have a situation that suggests that the abortion of the June 12 election is another coup d’etat,” Senator Tinubu said. “My question is, when are we going to stop tolerating injustices, coup d’etat and abuse by the people on whom we invested so much resources—the public funds of this country?… Yes, it is true that we have a crisis, but for every
Leave a comment