The arrest and detention of a leading Nigerian anti-corruption activist, Olanrewaju Suraju of HEDA, one of the first non-governmental groups to expose corruption allegations surrounding the acquisition of the OPL 245 oil field by oil multinationals Shell and Eni has drawn the ire of some international anti-corruption and human rights groups.
They have strongly condemned the trampling on the rights of Suraju and demanded that the Nigerian police should investigate the matter and release him immediately.
“We will be raising Mr Suraju’s totally unjustified detention with the board of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and calling for Nigeria’s suspension pending an investigation into Mr Suraju’s detention and the motivation for the allegations of forgery.
“We call for proper investigation of the forgery allegation and immediate halt to the target of Mr Suraju and HEDA for attack while also urging other human rights defenders and anti-corruption campaigners to do the same,’’ the rights groups said in a statement.
The statement, a copy of which was given to Persecondnews, was signed by Nicholas Hildyard of Cornerhouse, Simon Taylor of Globalwitness, Luca Manes of Re:Common and Arigbabu Sulaimon of HEDA.
Suraju along with the NGOs Corner House, Global Witness and Re:Common, has been accused by the former Nigerian Minister of Justice and Attorney-General of the Federation, Mohammed Adoke, of forging an email that formed part of the prosecution case in the recently concluded trial of the two multinationals and 11 other defendants in Milan.
The defendants were all acquitted.
The email was sent to an employee of JP Morgan Chase, the bank that held the proceeds of the deal on behalf of the Federal Government of Nigeria. It was signed by a Mohammed Bello Adoke.
The email was from an address associated with a company owned by Aliyu Abubakhar, who is charged along with Adoke in Nigeria with offenses related to the OPL 245 deal. Abubakhar denies wrongdoing in Nigeria, as does Adoke.
READ ALSO: OPL 245: Probe Adoke’s alleged forged legal request, anti-corruption group pressures UK
The email first came to light in 2021 as part of civil proceedings by the Federal Republic of Nigeria (FRN) against JP Morgan Chase [JPMC] in the High Court in London, where it was disclosed by JPMC and cited by the FRN in support of its claim.
In a joint statement, Suraju and the three NGOs have categorically denied Adoke’s assertions that the email is a forgery, and that the forgery was done by the organisations behind the petitions that led to the prosecution of Shell, Eni and others in Italy and Nigeria.
The groups state: “We recognise that the email would certainly appear damaging to Mr Adoke. Specifically, its points to an apparent association between a Mohammed Bello Adoke and the Abubakar company that subsequently arranged the purchase of a house for former Attorney General Mr. Mohammed Bello Adoke SAN. Moreover, that association is specifically tied to the OPL 245 deal through the email.
“We categorically deny that we forged the email, the notion is entirely fanciful. It was obtained through a government-to-government request from Italy to the United Kingdom. The documentation is now part of the public record and Mr Suraju supplied the full intergovernmental correspondence to the investigating police officer.
“It is clear from the correspondence that the email was obtained from JP Morgan by the UK Serious Fraud Office and transmitted directly to the Milan Prosecutor. Neither Mr Suraju and his organisation HEDA, nor Corner House nor Global Witness nor Re:Common were involved at any stage in the chain of custody.’’
“The original email as received by JPMC will have properties and electronic information that would enable the identification of the IP address from which it was sent.
“The Nigerian police should request this information and release Mr Suraju immediately,’’ the groups demanded.
Author
Leave a comment