Former Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami (SAN), has petitioned a Federal High Court in Abuja to vacate an interim forfeiture order obtained by the EFCC.
Malami asserts that the assets in question were acquired through “legitimate and lawful means,” noting they were fully disclosed in his asset declaration forms with the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB).
His legal team, led by Joseph Daudu (SAN), alleged that the anti-graft agency secured the order by misrepresenting facts and suppressing material evidence.
Malami’s motion argues that his diverse streams of income and business profits over the years provide sufficient evidence of lawful acquisition.
According to court filings, Malami’s declared income includes ₦374.6 million from salaries, severance pay, and estacodes.
Additionally, his counsel highlighted earnings from his roles on several high-level boards, including the Federal Judicial Service Commission (FJSC) and the Legal Practitioners’ Privileges Committee (LPPC).
“N574, 073, 000 as Income generated through disposed assets, N10, 017,382,684 turnover from businesses. N2, 522, 000, 000 being loans to businesses. N958,000,000 as a traditional gift from personal friends.”
Daudu equally explained that a total sum of N509, 880, 000 was realised as income from the launch and public presentation of a book titled, “Contemporary Issues on Nigerian Law and Practice, Thorny Terrains in Traversing the Nigerian Justice Sector: My Travails and Triumphs” by Malami.
Malami, former AGF under Muhammadu Buhari administration, wants an order of the court vacating the interim order made against three of the 57 properties listed by the anti-graft agency for forfeiture to the Federal Government.
He is challenging the EFCC on the property listed as No. 9, No. 18 and No. 48 in the ex parte motion it brought to the court on January 6, 2026.
The three properties sought to be discharged, include Plot 157, Lamido Crescent, Nasarawa, GRA, Kano, purchased in July 31, 2019 with no specific amount stated in the schedule as No. 9.
They also include a Bedroom Duplex and Boys Quarters at No.12, Yalinga Street, Off Adetokunbo Ademola Crescent, Wuse Il, Abuja, purchased in October 2018 at N150 million, and ADC Kadi Malami Foundation Building, bought at N56 million, listed as No. 18 and No. 48.
Persecondnews recalls that Justice Emeka Nwite, who sat as vacation judge, had on January 6, ordered the temporary forfeiture of 57 properties suspected to be proceeds of unlawful activities linked to Malami.
Justice Nwite, who had granted the order following an ex parte motion moved by the EFCC’s counsel, Ekele Iheanacho, SAN, to the effect, directed EFCC to publish the order in a national daily for interested person(s) to show cause, within 14 days, why all the properties should not be permanently forfeited to the Federal Government.
The multi-billion naira landed properties are located in Abuja, Kebbi, Kano and Kaduna States.
However, Malami had urged the court to dismiss the suit to prevent “conflicting outcomes duplicative litigation,” arguing that the proceeding was an assault on his fundamental right to own property, his presumption of innocence and his right to live in peace with his family.
In an application marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/20/2026, filed on January 26 by Daudu, Malami is seeking an order of the court vacating, setting aside and/or discharging the interim order(s) made on the 6th of January, 2026 against his properties listed as Nos. 9, 18, and 48 in the schedule of properties attached to the interim order of forfeiture of 6th January, 2026.
He said the properties have been duly declared in his assets declaration forms throughout his tenure as a public officer and No. 48 is held in trust for the Estate of late Khadi Malami Nassarawa.
“An order of this honourable court restraining the applicant/respondent (EFCC), acting by itself or through its servants, agents and proxies, from interfering with the respondent/applicant’s (Malami’s) properties in issue or disturbing the respondent/applicant’s ownership, possession and control thereof in the course of purportedly giving effect to the order of this honourable court made on the 6th of January, 2026.”
In a 14-ground argument, Daudu argued that the assets Nos. 9, 18, and 48, the subject of interim forfeiture, especially those declared in the various assets declaration forms of Malami, are not linked by prima facie evidence of an unlawful activity or a specific offence.
Daudu said Malami had declared the assets listed as Nos. 9, and 18 in his asset declaration forms filed with the CCB in 2019 and 2023 respectively, adding that, property No. 48 is held in trust by the former AGF for the benefit of the estate of his late father, Late Kadi Malami.
“These assets, their value and their root of title have been clearly stated and specifically demonstrated in the various asset declaration forms spanning from 2019 to 2023.
“The declaration above is prima facie evidence of the legitimacy of the acquisition and ownership of the properties,” Daudu said.
According to the senior lawyer, the order of interim forfeiture is not based on any prima facie establishment of unlawful purpose and is liable to be set aside.
He submitted that the court wrongly granted the order of interim forfeiture against these properties, “which were lawfully acquired post appointment of the respondent/applicant and declared with the Code of Conduct Bureau as legitimate assets of the respondent/applicant, in compliance with the 5th Schedule to the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, in 2019 and 2023.
“The interim order was obtained ex parte by suppression of material facts and misrepresentation. The interim order for forfeiture was obtained by manifest exaggeration, malicious inflation of the value of the assets, and unreasonable and incompetent valuation deliberately manipulated to mislead the court, negatively affecting its discretion in granting an order based on manipulated facts and conclusions deliberately cooked up by the applicant/respondent (EFCC).
“That there is no prima facie evidence placed before this honourable court by the applicant/respondent (EFCC) to warrant the properties linked to the respondent/applicant (Malami) to be liable for forfeiture to the Federal Government of Nigeria.
“The proper remedy for preventing conflicting outcomes duplicative litigation is for this honourable court to dismiss or strike out this suit.
“That this proceeding is an assault on the applicant’s fundamental right to property, his presumption of innocence and his right to live in peace with his family,” the counsel submitted.
Justice Nwite had, on January 6, adjourned the matter till January 27 for report of compliance on the publication of the interim order for forfeiture.
But the matter could not go on because the case was not on the cause list for the day because the matter was heard during vacation period and the judge, having concluded the vacation cases, remitted the case file back to the chief judge for re-assignment.
It was also observed that there were lawyers in the courtroom on January 27, who had filed processes on behalf of their clients to stop the court from going ahead with the proceedings for final forfeiture of the assets.
Malami, who is facing a money laundering charge slammed on him by the EFCC, is also presently held in custody of Department of State Services for another offence bordering on alleged terrorism financing.
Leave a comment