Facing the crucible of Nigeria’s federal lawmakers, critical stakeholders in the media industry have spurned the proposed amendment of the Nigerian Press Council Act.
The stakeholders are the International Press Centre (IPC), Media Rights Agenda (MRA), the Centre for Media Law and Advocacy (CMLA), and the Premium Times Centre for Investigative Journalism (PTCIJ).
They contended that the measures contained in the amendment bill seek to make the government the arbiter of truth, while subjecting the entire media sector in Nigeria to the control of the Minister of Information and Culture in violation of internationally accepted norms and standards. They outlined their objections to the measures in a joint memorandum presented to the House of Representatives Committee on Information, National Orientation, Ethics and Values at a public hearing in Abuja, on the Bill for An Act to Amend the Nigerian Press Council Act.
In the memorandum signed by Mr. Arogundade as well as Mr. Edetaen Ojo, MRA’s Executive Director; Mr. Richard Akinnola, Executive Director of CMLA; and Mr. Dapo Olorunyomi, PTCIJ Executive Director, the organizations noted that “although masquerading as regulation, the proposals contained in the amendment Bill are aimed at restricting freedom of expression and media freedom.”
Persecondnews reports that the memorandum was presented on behalf of the stakeholders by IPC’s Executive Director, Mr Lanre Arogundade.
The groups noted that although regulation is necessary in “this age of fake news and hate speech”, such regulation should not erode media independence or freedom and should not be unduly punitive.
“Regulator must also be free of the stranglehold of the powers that be, political or other interests, so that it can judiciously adjudicate in matters bothering on the infringement of the code of ethics of the profession of journalism.” They complained that the amendments as currently proposed would give exclusive powers on the composition of the Board of such sensitive body like the press council whose independence is of paramount importance, to the President and the Minister without confirmation by the National Assembly, unlike what obtains with other regulatory bodies such as the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC). “The amendments seek to empower the Council to ensure truth and genuineness in reporting, which would make a Council dominated by Government appointees and controlled by the Government the arbiter of truth. “The proposed amendment to the functions of the Council has the additional effect of making the Nigerian media a department of the Federal Ministry of Information, and subjecting the entire media sector to the control of the Minister by giving him the power to approve a national Press Code and standards to guide conduct of print media, related media houses and media practitioners,” they stated.
The organisations objected to the highly punitive measures which can be taken by the Council against media houses and media practitioners for alleged violation of the press code without judicial intervention, saying they constitute a potential threat to press freedom and media survival as they could be used as a political weapon against the media. They criticized the proposal to empower the council to “receive, process and consider applications for the establishment, ownership, and operation of print media and other related media houses” as a violation of section 39 of the Constitution, which gives everyone the right to own, establish and operate any medium, and called on the Committee to reject the proposals on the composition and functions of the Council. The organizations suggested that the power to determine sanctions relating to hefty fines should be vested in the courts and not the Council.
“The provision relating to revocation of license for alleged publication of fake news should be removed from the Act as decisions on appropriate sanctions for such offences should belong to the courts.”