Nobel Laureate, Prof. Wole Soyinka has questioned President Muhammadu Buhari’s credibility for endorsing Sen. Iyiola Omisore, a prime suspect in the murder of the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Chief Bola Ige, in December 2001 as National Secretary of the All Progressives Congress (APC).
Soyinka reminder of Buhari’s election promise in 2015 to revisit the murder of Ige about 20 years ago.
Persecondnews.com recalls that Chief James Ajibola Idowu Ige (SAN), a former governor of Oyo State, and llesa, Osun-born, was murdered in cold blood in his Bodija, Ibadan residence on December 23, 2001 as a serving Minister of Justice.
Also, Omisore, a one-time Osun Deputy Governor, was on March 26, 2022 elected as National Secretary of APC at its National Convention held at the Eagles Square, Abuja.
According to Soyinka, by the election of Omisore, investigative revisit of Ige’s murder is already hamstrung and disrobed of credibility.
“I think the nation should simply relieve President Buhari of his pledge. I am certain the Inspector-General of Police will be equally relieved and can now turn his mind and energy to the national accustomed posture – Business as Usual,” he said in a statement.
The statement issued on Saturday, is titled: “Perhaps closed files should remain just that-Closed?”
He noted that barely three months had passed since the 20th anniversary of the murder of late Ige, an occasion he used to remind Buhari of a subsisting election pledge.
“That pledge was to re-open the files on the spate of unsolved political assassinations that had plagued the nation in recent decades.
“Prominent among those cases was that of the Minister of Justice, murdered on his way to take up a prestigious position with the United Nations.
“Presidential response was swift. Buhari ordered the Inspector-General of Police to re-open those files and resume investigations. The nation has patiently awaited even a hint of Work in Progress.
“Most, I am certain, expect no less than a revaluation of prior investigative efforts. None, to my knowledge, has attempted to rush the Chief of Police and his team into judgment.
“We all take solace in the knowledge that the wheels of justice grind slowly, but they arrive. Eventually,” Soyinka said.
Soyinka said an unusual turn of events has raised questions, as the ruling party, headed by the same President, had just elected as its National Secretary one of the prime suspects of “this most notorious of the nation’s unsolved murders.”
“Not for a moment does one suggest that mere accusation, even trial, presumes Guilt. More than a mere verdict is involved in any trial, however.
“The process of arriving at that ultimate destination – justice – is integral to the very concept of democracy and equality under the law. That process is one of the structures of civic education.
He continued: “Unresolved till today were quite a number of untidy, even suspect aspects of the investigation, prosecution and trials, aspects which revealed improper cell co-habitation by suspects under custody.
“That this led necessarily to recantations of earlier depositions is not thereby proven, but the fact remains that such U-turns did take place.
“One was so brazen that it induced a heart attack that proved fatal to the victim’s wife, another Justice – Mrs Atinuke Ige.
“That the prime suspect was privileged in a number of improper ways went beyond mere allegation. Political interventions, including pressure on the judiciary during bail hearings, cannot be denied.
“A judge under such pressure kept a diary with accusations, pages of which he consigned to friends for safekeeping,” Soyinka stressed.
Soyinka added: “With the emergence of the said prime suspect as National Secretary of the Ruling Party, is the Inspector-General of Police equipped to confront political obstacles in a resumption of investigation?
“Is there any guarantee that the result will see the light of day? How suspect, ab initio, will be the conclusions, given the present political ordering?
“I repeat: we are speaking of blatant, undeniable exercise of political interventions during investigations and the arraignment of suspects.
“Prior incumbency of the position of National Secretary of a ruling party has demonstrated the potent interventionist clout that can be wielded from that office.
“The president has personally received, and thus anointed the new incumbent. Since he remains central to any re-investigation – whatever form or direction it takes – just what value of objective assessment can be placed on the presidential pledge?”
Leave a comment